primary antibodies against arhgap29 (Novus Biologicals)
Structured Review

Primary Antibodies Against Arhgap29, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 13 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against arhgap29/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 13 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Influence of ARHGAP29 on the Invasion of Mesenchymal-Transformed Breast Cancer Cells"
Article Title: Influence of ARHGAP29 on the Invasion of Mesenchymal-Transformed Breast Cancer Cells
Journal: Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells9122616
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic representation of the overlap of microarray data of 223 genes upregulated by induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and 32 considered Rho GTPase-activating proteins. Microarray data from Ziegler et al. were re-analyzed to show the upregulated expression of selected genes. Gene expression data of MCF-7 wild-type cells and mesenchymal-transformed MCF-7-EMT cells were compared. Among the genes examined were 32 genes that had previously been recognized as Rho GTPase-activating proteins. EMT-induced upregulation in MCF-7-EMT cells was found in 223 genes in comparison to MCF-7 wild-type cells. Only the Rho GTPase-activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29) was found to overlap. The relative change in expression (FC, fold change) of genes under consideration was 1.0–4.53. ( B ) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the luminal A breast cancer subtype (Threshold = 8 FPKM; ARHGAP29 low n = 271; ARHGAP29 high n = 209; Statistical test: Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test; p = 0.0141). ( C ) Evidence of the significantly increased basal expression of ARHGAP29 in MCF-7-EMT cells was found. Basal expression (average expression) of ARHGAP29 in the cell lines MCF-7- and MCF-7-EMT was found. Microarray data from Ziegler et al., 2014 comparing the gene expression of MCF-7 wild-type cells and mesenchymal-transformed MCF-7-EMT cells were examined to investigate ARHGAP29 gene expression. ( D ) Expression of ARHGAP29 in MCF-7, MCF-7-EMT, T-47D, T-47D-EMT, and HCC1806 breast cancer cells. Expression of ARHGAP29 was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH expression using at least three biological and technical replicates. Mean ± SEM values are given. Significance was determined with the help of unpaired t-tests; (*) p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Microarray, Expressing, Gene Expression, Transformation Assay, Comparison, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Detection of reduced Rho GTPase activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29) expression after transient siRNA transfection of MCF-7-EMT, T-47D-EMT, and HCC1806 breast cancer cells. Breast cancer cells were transiently transfected with ARHGAP29-specific siRNA or non-targeting control siRNA (control). The expression of ARHGAP29 was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH expression. The effect of downregulation of ARHGAP29 on the invasion of MCF-7-EMT ( B ), T-47D-EMT, ( C ) and HCC1806 ( D ) breast cancer cells was investigated. Breast cancer cells were transiently transfected with ARHGAP29-specific siRNA or non-targeting control siRNA (control). The invasion of transiently transfected breast cancer cells was analyzed after 96 h of coculture with MG63 osteosarcoma cells. The number of invaded cells in the treatment group was calibrated to the number of invaded cells in the control group using at least three biological and technical replicates. Mean ± SEM values are given. Significance was determined with the help of unpaired t -tests; (****) p < 0.0001; (**) p < 0.01; (*) p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Transfection, Control, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of the downregulation of Rho GTPase activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29) on the proliferation of MCF-7-EMT ( A ), T-47D-EMT ( B ), and HCC1806 ( C ) breast cancer cells. Breast cancer cells were transiently transfected with ARHGAP29-specific siRNA or non-targeting control siRNA (control). After cell culture for 120 h, transiently transfected breast cancer cells were detached and counted using a Neubauer counting chamber. The number of cells in the treatment group was calibrated to the cell number in the control group using at least three biological and technical replicates. Mean ± SEM values are given. Significance was determined with the help of unpaired t-tests; (**) p < 0.01; (*) p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Probability of interaction of Rho GTPase activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29) with AKT1, SIRT1, PTPN13, CDC42, MAGEA11, and RHOD. In silico analyses were carried out using the GIANT web server (Genome-wide Integrated Analysis of gene Networks in Tissues, provided by HumanBase, https://hb.flatironinstitute.org/ , last accessed on 26 July 2019). A value of 0.1 was chosen as a minimum confidence interval to investigate interactions. The maximum number of genes considered was seven. The color of the connecting lines between interaction partners reflects possible interactions from 0 (no interaction) to 1 (high probability of interaction). The expression of AKT1 and the pAKT1/AKT1 ratio in MCF-7-EMT ( B ), T-47D-EMT ( C ), and HCC1806 ( D ) breast cancer cells after knock-down of ARHGAP29 expression are shown. Breast cancer cells were transiently transfected with ARHGAP29-specific siRNA or non-targeting control siRNA (control). The expression of AKT1 was determined using Western blot analysis and normalized to GAPDH expression using at least three biological and technical replicates. The pAKT1/AKT1 ratio was analyzed as the quotient of pAKT1 versus AKT1 expression. Representative blots for ARHGAP29, AKT1 and pAKT1 are shown. Mean ± SEM values are given. Significance was determined with the help of unpaired t-tests; (***) p < 0.001; (**) p < 0.01; (*) p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: In Silico, Genome Wide, Expressing, Knockdown, Transfection, Control, Western Blot
